Chess rating list – anchored on Rebel 6 UCI and Fritz BnB – Pentium 90

TOP 20:

   # PLAYER                           : RATING  ERROR   POINTS  PLAYED    (%)
   1 Stockfish 16.1                   :   3662     41   2246.5    3418   65.7%
   2 Berserk 13                       :   3597     39    756.0    1520   49.7%
   3 Obsidian 12                      :   3550     39    831.5    1900   43.8%
   4 Caissa 1.18                      :   3534     39    627.5    1522   41.2%
   5 RubiChess 20240112               :   3530     39    771.0    1900   40.6%
   6 Clover 6.1                       :   3520     42    119.0     380   31.3%
   7 Seer 2.8.0                       :   3510     42    114.5     380   30.1%
   8 Alexandria 6.1.0                 :   3506     42    112.5     380   29.6%
   9 Koivisto 9.0                     :   3506     33   1673.5    3420   48.9%
  10 Rebel 16.3                       :   3491     42    106.0     380   27.9%
  11 Slowchess 2.8                    :   3433     43    219.0     340   64.4%
  12 Minic 3.30                       :   3323     32    659.0    1412   46.7%
  13 Black Marlin 7                   :   3288     32    681.0    1792   38.0%
  14 Arasan 23.3 NNUE                 :   3288     38    129.5     340   38.1%
  15 Fire 8.1                         :   3286     32    321.5     612   52.5%
  16 Pedone 3.1                       :   3282     30    591.5     952   62.1%
  17 Igel 3.05                        :   3280     28    798.0    1496   53.3%
  18 Komodo 14                        :   3271     33    823.5    3420   24.1%
  19 Ethereal 13 classic              :   3264     35    249.0     408   61.0%
  20 Xiphos 0.6                       :   3199     34    216.5     408   53.1%

Update: Added Stockfish 16.1, Berserk 13, Obsidian 12, Caissa 1.18, Rubichess 20240112, Clover 6.1, Alexandria 6.1.0 and Rebel 16.3.

Click here to download the complete rating list:

ratinglist.txt

The rating list is updated to 27/04/2024, it is calculated with Ordo and it is based on the following assumptions.

  • The Elo score of Rebel 6 UCI version is fixed at 2470, therefore it acts as an “anchor” for all the other engines. I calculated this score as the average between results obtained by the engine againsts humans players in the ’90, with the sources I was able to recover in Internet (Talkchess.com, Rebel14.nl, forums…).
  • Besides Rebel 6, Fritz Brains in Bahrain is also used, at a speed of 3500 kN/s, with its rating fixed at 2800 elo.
  • Time for each match has been fixed to 40 moves/120 minutes repeated, calibrated on a Pentium 90 processing power. The processing power has been emulated, after estimation by using benchmarks with real P90 results. Accordingly, on modern PC the effective match time was fixed to 40 moves/125” or 40/130” depending on the PC used for the test, with expected results similar to blitz matches. For some chess engines, such as for example Chess Titans, it was not possible to define the same match time; for this reason, I have shown for this engine, the characteristic of the PC used.
  • The opening suite consists of 190 positions, which are repeated for each engine (each engine plays each opening one as white, and one as black). For older engines, which do not uses standard UCI of XBoard interfaced (such as Battlechess for example), I’ve reproduced by hand the moves as indicated by the programs. The time for this engines has been calibrated on the processing power of a Pentium 90 as well. For all this reasons, the number of match of these engines are few, and based on random selection of the 34 opening positions. The opening suite is downloadable here.
  • All the tested chess engines are freely downloadable from Intenet, except for the programs I’ve bought myself years ago, and are all limited to 1 core.
  • Only the best version of Stockfish is shown in the “Top 10”, I’ve removed all derivatives (such as Shashchess for example). In the full rating list I’ve included them all (past SF versions, derivatives, clones…).
  • The main goal of this rating list, made for my exclusive enjoyment, was to estimate the level of play of modern engines, with respect to the older ones, but also to evaluate the actual playing strenght of many engines I loved in my youth (the already cited Battleches, for example).

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *